The “Eleventh Night” Celebration of the Battle of the Boyne

 
The famous Battle of the Boyne was fought on 1st July, 1690, and is celebrated tonight, Bonefire night, 11th July each year and commemorated along with Derry, Aughrim and Enniskillen by the Sons and Daughters of the Glorious Revolution of 1688 on 12th July. The battle took place on 1st July 1690 in the “old style” (Julian) calendar. This is equivalent to 11th July in the “new style” (Gregorian) calendar, although today its commemoration is held on 12th July, on which the decisive Battle of Aughrim was fought a year later. But 11th July is the actual date when the Battle of the Boyne took place and the Eleventh Night is the real night of its celebration.
  

File:BattleOfBoyne.gif
 
The Boyne has been described as one of the decisive battles of the western world, for it signalled to Europe defeat for the Absolute Monarchial power of the French and the Jacobites — but it was not the final victory of the War. Neither was it a battle altogether characterised by the direction of the professional soldier but a magnificent drama portraying the personalities of the two kings, each of whom caused problems for his own most able generals.
 
For if Sarsfield was betrayed by the cowardice of James, so Schomberg was dismayed by the almost foolhardy courage of William, who must have been familiar with the exploits of that earlier Guillaume d’Orange (William of Orange) , so prominent in the Old French Chansons de Geste (Songs of Heroic Deeds) of the 12th and 13th Centuries. The Prince of Orange’s own legendary bravery was linked to a strong, yet tolerant, religious conviction and a warm attachment to the Protestant faith, which sprang from earnest thought and attention. He possessed great military genius and soundness of judgement. At the Boyne his tactics were proved to have been correct. Yet, if the battle was won by William, the pursuit was not.
 
The losses on both sides had been less than on any field of battle of equal importance and celebrity — fifteen hundred Jacobites and five hundred Williamites. But among the latter were Schomberg, the master soldier, and Walker of Derry, the heart and soul of his people. William’s physical infirmities, his wound in the early part of the battle and the fatigue he had endured exhorting his men, had made him incapable of further progress. The King could not do everything, but what was not done by him was not done at all. And so the French and Jacobites escaped to fight another day.
 

From October 1690 until May 1691 no military operation on a large scale was attempted in the Kingdom of Ireland. During that winter and the following spring the island was divided almost equally between the contending parties. The whole of Ulster, the greater part of Leinster, and about one third of Munster were now controlled by the Williamites; the whole of Connaught, the greater part of Munster and two or three counties of Leinster were still held by the Jacobites.

Continuous guerrilla activity persisted, however, along the rough line of demarcation. In the spring of 1691, James’s Lord Lieutenant, Tyrconnell, returned to Ireland, followed by the distinguished French general Saint Ruth, who was commissioned as Commander-in-Chief of the Jacobite army. Saint Ruth was a man of great courage and resolution but his name was synonymous with the merciless suppression and torture of the Protestants of France, including those of the district of Orange in the South, of which William was Prince.

The Marquess of Ruvigny, hereditary leader of the French Protestants, and elder brother of that brave Caillemot who had fallen at the Boyne, now joined the Dutch general Ginkell, who was strengthening the Williamite army at Mullingar. Ginkell first took Ballymore where he was joined by the Danish auxiliaries under the command of the Duke of Wurtemburg, and then the strategic town of Athlone.

Thus was the stage set for one of the fiercest battles of that age or any other. Determined to stake everything in a final showdown St Ruth pitched his camp about thirty miles from Athlone on the road to Galway. He waited for Ginkell on the slope of a hill almost surrounded by red bog, chosen with great judgement near the ruined castle of Aughrim.

Soon after 6 o’clock on the morning of 12 July, 1691, the Williamite army moved slowly towards the Jacobite positions. Delay was caused, however, by a thick fog which hung until noon and only later in the afternoon did the two armies confront each other.

The Jacobite army of twenty-five thousand men had further protected themselves with a breastwork constructed without difficulty. The Williamites, numbering under twenty thousand, advanced over treacherous and uneven ground, sinking deep in mud at every step. The Jacobites defended the breastwork with great resolution for two hours so that, as evening was fast closing in, Ginkell began to consider a retreat. St Ruth was jubilant and pressed his advantage.

However, Ruvigny and Mackay, with the Huguenot and British Cavalry, succeeded in bypassing the bog at a place where only two horsemen could ride abreast. There they laid hurdles on the soft ground to create a broader and safer path and, as reinforcements rapidly joined them, the flank of the Jacobite army was soon turned. St Ruth was rushing to the rescue when a cannonball took off his head. He was carried in secret from the field and, without direction, the Jacobites faltered. The Williamite infantry returned to their frontal attack with rugged determination and soon the breastwork was carried. The Jacobites retreated fighting bravely from enclosure to enclosure until finally they broke and fled.

This time there was no William to restrain the soldiers. Only four hundred prisoners were taken and not less than seven thousand Jacobites were killed, a greater number of men in proportion to those engaged than in any other battle of that time. Of the victors six hundred were killed, and about a thousand were wounded. If the night had not been moonless and visibility reduced by a misty rain, which allowed Sarsfield to cover the retreat, scarcely a Jacobite would have escaped alive.

Waiting in the wings with his own army was a remarkable character named Balldearg O’Donnell.  He had arrived from Spain shortly after the Battle of the Boyne claiming to be a lineal descendant of the ancient ”Gaelic” Cruthin kings of Tyrconnell in Ulster.  He also claimed to be the O’Donnell ‘with a red mark’ (ball dearg) who, according to ancient prophecy, was destined to lead his followers to victory.  Many ordinary Ulster Catholics had flocked to his standard, causing great hostility on the part of Tyrconnell who saw him as a threat to his own earldom.

Balldearg thus remained aloof from the Battle of Aughrim.  He proceeded to join the standard of William with 1200 men on 9th September, 1691, and marched to assist in the reduction of the Jacobite town of Sligo.  This garrison surrendered on 16th September, 1691, on condition that they were conveyed to Limerick.  Balldearg remained loyal to William and later entered his service in Flanders, with those of his men who elected to follow him.

With the surrender of Limerick on 3 October, 1691, the War finally ended and the ‘Glorious Revolution’ was complete. Most of the radical exiles in Holland, including John Locke, returned to England as participants in, or in the wake of, the Revolution. Locke’s Protestantism, which perceived humankind as constituting a spiritual community within which individuals were free, equal, endowed with reason, and capable of acting for the common good, sought to establish the basis on which society could progress to enlightenment.

Furthermore, Locke’s labour theory of property antedated by more than a century the economic debate which would come to dominate European political thinking. During William and Mary’s reign the National Debt was commenced, the Bank of England established, the modern system of finance introduced, ministerial responsibility recognised, the standing army transferred to the control of parliament, the liberty of the press secured and the British constitution established on a firm basis.

 As the Scotch-Irish Cultural Revolution gains momentum in Appalachia, it is also important to consider its intellectual epicentre, The College of William and Mary, in Williamsburg, Virginia. The college’s Williamite legacy pre-dates the formation of the Orange Order in Ireland .   Privately founded in 1693 by letters patent issued by King William III and Queen Mary II, The College of William and Mary is the second-oldest institution of higher education in the United States after Harvard University. William and Mary is considered one of the original “Public Ives”, a publicly funded university providing a quality of education comparable to those of the Ivy League.
 
William and Mary educated U.S. Presidents Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, and John Tyler, as well as other key figures important to the development of America, including U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, Speaker of the House Henry Clay, and sixteen signers of the Declaration of Independence. William and Mary founded the Phi Beta Kappa academic honour society in 1776 and was the first school of higher education in the United States to install an honour code of conduct for students. The establishment of graduate programs in law and medicine in 1779 make it one of the first universities in the United States.
Posted in Article | Comments Off on The “Eleventh Night” Celebration of the Battle of the Boyne

The Shankill Soldier

Mummy can you hear me
I’m lying here all alone
In this foreign country
So many miles from home
 
I can see your gentle face
Tears shining in your eyes
When you left me at the station
And we said our last goodbyes
 
My life is flashing here before me
I know my end is near
And running down my cheek
I can taste a salty tear
 
I can see our little house
Just off the Shankill Road
And all my friends I played with
With them I won’t grow old
 
I can see my neighbours
Standing with their cups of tea
Some of my wee neighbours
Were always good to me
 
And I can see sweet Maggie
She lived two doors away
My dream was for to fall in love
And marry her some day
 
And I can see my Father
A gentle man was he
When he came home from the ship yard
He would rock me on his knee
 
Forgive me mum for leaving you
I know I’ve broke your heart
But I’m fighting for my country
I had to do my part
 
Just remember mummy
What you taught me way back then
When our time on earth is over
We shall meet up once again
 
So mummy I’ll be waiting
At Heaven’s open door
And when the good Lord calls you
We shall never part no more
 
Mummy I have to go now
I’m in a lot of pain
I’m waiting on my Saviour
Calling out my name
 
I hope they take my body home
To that wee place of my Birth
Then I can rest forever
In my good old Ulster earth
 
Marlene Osmond
 

Sorry for disturbing you Ian , a friend wrote this poem and I thought you might enjoy it , I personally think it’s amazing…Rab Lavery 
 
Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Shankill Soldier

John Hewitt – Home Words

EXHIBITION LAUNCH 

PRONI today invited Pretani Associates to the launch of the exhibition: John Hewitt – Home Words 

9TH JULY at 1.00pm

PRONI, 2 Titanic Boulevard, Belfast 

John Hewitt, the Ulster poet, author, lecturer, broadcaster and journalist – bequeathed over 7,000 documents and volumes to the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI) in 1987.  

As keeper of this important Archive (PRONI Ref. D3838), PRONI was delighted to welcome this excellent exhibition. Home Words went on display in their atrium space, directly below the large-scale reproduction of Hewitt’s Ulster Names.

This exhibition celebrated the life, work and legacy of John Hewitt and was created by Frank Ferguson, Kathryn White and John McMillan from the University of Ulster in partnership with Tony Kennedy from the John Hewitt Society and Helen Perry from the Causeway Museum Service. The project was supported by the Heritage Lottery Fund. 

At the launch, curators Frank Ferguson talked us through the story of the exhibition. Frank and Kathryn White are co-editors of Hewitt’s manuscript autobiography, A North Light, and Frank steered us through the revelations teased out through this research. A special poetry reading by Frank Sewell followed, as well as a presentation from Des McCabe (PRONI) on the Hewitt Papers. 

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on John Hewitt – Home Words

Speeches from the Somme: Guillemont 1st July 2014

Monsieur le Maire de Guillemont Didier Samain et Monsieur le Maire de Ginchy Jean Marc Delmotte, De la part de l’Association de la Somme, je tiens à vous remercier de votre acceuil aujourd’hui à Guillemont ainsi que l’hospitalité généreuse que vous avez offerte. Nos amis francais nous honorent toujours. Merci.

On 7th June this year we witnessed the 97th anniversary of the Battle of Messines Ridge and commemorated the death of Willie Redmond,the Nationalist MP in the House of Commons. The Battle of Messines Ridge has been described as the first wholly successful battle of the First World War. At the beginning of the Battle at exactly 3.10 am nearly a million pounds of high explosive made the greatest earthquake ever known in Western Europe, accompanied by the mightiest crash made by humanity to that date. The 36th (Ulster) Division and the 16th (Irish) Division, who fought side by side, had studied the battle plan with great care, having learned the lessons of the Somme.

Here at Guillemont and neighbouring Ginchy, Redmond’s 16th (Irish) Division  lost heavily in the first ten days of September 1916 with casualties of 240 of its 435 officers and 4090 of 10410 other ranks among its infantry and engineer units. Two-thirds of these were wounded, another fifth missing, with the remaining 650 killed in action. Among the 9thDublin Fusillers were Private James Liddy of Amiens Street, a well known Dublin confectioner, as well as Ginchy’s best known casualty, Lieutenant Tom Kettle.

(A memorial to Tom Kettle by Francis W. Doyle-Jones stands in St. Stephen’s Green in Dublin.  It quotes lines from a sonnet he penned to his daughter shortly before his death (‘To My Daughter Betty’):

Know that we fools, now with the foolish dead,
Died not for the flag, nor King, nor Emperor,
But for a dream, born in a herdsman’s shed,
And for the secret Scripture of the poor.) 

On 31st July 1917, during the third battle of Ypres, Francis Ledwidge of the Royal Inniskilling Fusilliers was engaged in road making with many others when he was blown to bits with six other soldiers by a German shell. He had fought everywhere from Suvia Bay in the Dardanelles to Serbia to France and Belgium. But he was killed suddenly and almost by accident drinking tea with his friends. Born the son of an immigrant farm labourer in 1897, Ledwidge claimed the noble heritage of the dispossessed Irish peasantry. While he wrote ardently of nature and the pastoral grandeur of his native Boyne Valley, his short life – as a local political representative, an activist of the Irish Volunteers – was a passionate testimony on human rights. Although he is best known for his moving tribute to Thomas MacDonagh, Ledwidge himself was fighting in France during the 1916 rising. “I joined the British Army” he said, “because she stood between Ireland and an enemy to our civilisation, and I would not have her say that she defended us while we did nothing at home but pass resolutions.” 

The poetry of Francis Ledwidge evokes an Ireland of traditional nostalgia. But Seamus Heaney has said of Ledwidge that his fate was more complex and more modern, his moral courage alone gave him “membership in the company of the walking wounded, wherever they are to be found at any given time.” He was buried, No 5, in row B of the second plot in Artillery Wood Cemetery, about 3 miles North of Ypres in Belgium, and has joined the ranks of such fellow poets as Wilfrid Owen, Julian Grenfell, Rupert Brooke and Siegfried Sassoon. 

As a tribute to these fellow poets who fought and died in the Great War, known and unknown, let me read one of his last poems: 

After the War 

Now is the story over

Over the grief and pain

And down in the purple clover

The red lips meet again

 

But one in the dewy shadows

Waited through all the noon

And they told her out of the meadows

Someone was coming home

 

Some lips spoke of tomorrow

And someone of yesterday spoke

But O! the heart in sorrow

On the rocks of trouble broke

 

I longed for to sing delighted

And laugh with the newly gay

But a gloom on my soul alighted

And would not go away.

To the sons of Ulster and Soldiers of Ireland we say:-

“Sons of Ulster, Soldiers of Ireland do not be anxious. The war is over – both here and in your beloved Ireland. The Western Front is no more and Ireland at last is at peace with herself and with her people. We will always remember you, so long as the sun shines and the rain falls and the wind blows and the great river Somme runs gently to the sea”.

Innui, deir muid le fir Uladh agus le fir na hÉireann:-

“A Fheara Uladh agus a Shaighdiúirí na hÉireann, ná biodh imni oraibh. Tá an Cogadh thart – ní amháin san áit seo, ach in bhur dtír dhílis féin in Éirinn. Níl an Fronta Thiar ann níos mó, agus, so deireadh, tá tír na hÉireann faoi shíocháin léi féin agus len a pobal. Ach chomh fada is a shoilsíonn an ghrian, agus a thiteann an fhearthainn, agus a shéideann an ghaoth, agus chomh fada is a théann abhainn mhór an Somme go caoin chun na farraige, bedh cuimhne againn araibh go deo”. 

Dr Ian Adamson OBE

Chairman of the Somme Association

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Speeches from the Somme: Guillemont 1st July 2014

Speeches from the Somme: The Ulster Tower 1st July 2014

“Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Theresa Villiers, Monsieur le sous Préfet de La Somme Baptiste Rolland, Minister of State Jonathan Bell, Irish Minister of State Dinny Mc Ginley, Distinguished Guests, My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen, On behalf of the Somme Association may I welcome you to our annual Somme Commemoration ceremony.

On this day, 1st July 1916, 98 years ago, at the commencement of the Battle of the Somme, the men of the famous 36th (Ulster) Division advanced out of Thiepval Wood behind you towards this point on the Schwaben Redoubt and on reaching here, passed into the pages of history, legend and high renown. This advance, when they sustained 5,500 casualties, under continuous fire, is for us the most memorable single episode of the First World War.

It may be that there are certain setbacks of such magnitude and heroism, in this case the enormous losses of the 36th Ulster Division here at the Somme, that they serve to sustain and temper a people instead of weakening them. Or else, perhaps the setbacks come to have an energising, emblematic power. Perhaps, it may be that the Somme has come to symbolise unconsciously the thwarted nationhood of the Ulster People. Perhaps at the level of community consciousness the loss of the sons of Ulster and the founding of Northern Ireland are intertwined. The Battle of the Somme became Northern Ireland. 

The supremely impressive Stormont Parliament Buildings and the splendidly reassuring Burgher Palace, the Belfast City Hall, epitomise that symbolism in our time. So it is that we feel reassured in the presence here today of representatives of our MLA’s, Mayors, Aldermen and women, and Councillors, from Councils throughout Northern Ireland, constituting as many of them do our Somme Advisory Council.

En ce jour sacré nous commémorons le sacrifice de ces héros tombés pour la liberté. Nous ne cherchoilns pas seulement à les glorifier, mais à veiller à ce que un tel désastre ne se reproduise plus jamais.

To the Mothers of Ulster we say:-

“Mothers of Ulster. Grieve no more for your sons. For your sons now lie in the bosom of a great and noble nation. And your sons are no longer solely the Sons of Ulster, they have become the Sons of France”.

“Mithers o Ulster, Greet nae mair fer yer sins. Aye, fer yer sins noo lee amang a grand an gintil fowk,
An yer sins are nae mair jist the Sins o Ulster, They have becum the Sins o Fraunce forbye”.

To the people of France we say:-

“People of France, mother of nations, we thank you for your generosity and kindness to these our children who rest now in peace in the most beautiful gardens on earth. We pray that their sacrifice will not be in vain and that there will be no more war and that the peoples of Europe will walk together in mutual forgiveness, understanding and respect until the end of the world”.

Au people de France nous disons:-

“Peuple de France, mére des nations, nous vous remercions de votre générosité pour nos enfants qui reposent en paix dans les jardins les plus beaux du monde. Nous prions pour que leur sacrifice n’ait pas été vain, pour qu’il n’y ait plus de guerre, et pour que les peuples d’Europe puissent marcher ensemble et se pardonner, se comprendre et se respecter mutuellement jusqu à la fin des temps”.

Zu den Franzosen sagen wir:-

Bevölkerung von Frankreich, Mutter von Nationen, wir danken Ihnen für Ihre Grosszügigkeit und Freundlichkeit für unsere Kinder, die in diesen schönen Gärten in Frieden ruhen. Wir beten, dass das Opfer unserer Kinder nicht umsonst gewesen ist und dass es zu keinem weiteren Krieg mehr kommen wird, dass die Völker Europas in Vergebung, Verständnis und Respekt miteinander in die Zukunft gehen können.

And in honour of our Secretary of State, I speak in Lakota (Oglala Sioux), the Hymn of the Warriors

Ho Tunkasila Wakan Tanka
Oyate oyasin unsiwicalapo na owicakiyapo
Nahan waci wicasi na waci winyan wopila tanka
Nahan oyate oyasin canku luta ognamani owicakiyapo
Lecel wacin ho hecel lena, oyate kin nipi kte.
Mitakuye Oyasin

 Which in Wasicu(English) is 

Grandfather Great Spirit, Almighty God,

Have pity on and help all the People
Many Thanks for the Performers, male and female,
Help all the People to walk the Red Road of Peace
This I ask so that the People will prosper
You are all my relatives

The Somme Association would like to thank The Lowland Band,The Royal Regiment of Scotland; The 1st and 2nd Battalions of the The Royal Irish Regiment; Rossen Platoon, 4th Battalion The Royal Welsh, (Clwyd AFC) and Canon Bruce Hawkins, Chaplain of the Royal British Legion Somme Branch.”

Dr Ian Adamson OBE

Chairman Somme Association

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Speeches from the Somme: The Ulster Tower 1st July 2014

Somme Association Pilgrimage II

The Somme Association's photo.

Afternoon: A lunch will be served at the Ulster Memorial Tower for the Somme Association tour and invited guests. 1430hrs. Northern Ireland Service of Remembrance at the Ulster Memorial Tower followed by a Wreath laying Service at 16th (Irish) Division Memorial at Guillemont.      Evening at leisure

The Somme Association's photo.

 
 

Tuesday 1st July

0730hrs                                   Breakfast in hotel.

0900hrs                       Morning: Depart for Thiepval. At 1100hrs Commonwealth Service of Remembrance at Thiepval Memorial to the Missing.  

Afternoon: A lunch will be served at the Ulster Memorial Tower for the Somme Association tour and invited guests. 1430hrs. Northern Ireland Service of Remembrance at the Ulster Memorial Tower followed by a Wreath laying Service at 16th (Irish) Division Memorial at Guillemont.      Evening at leisure

 

 

 
 
Posted in Article | Comments Off on Somme Association Pilgrimage II

Somme Association Pilgrimage I

28TH June 2014 – 2ndJuly 2014

ITINERARY

The Somme Association's photo.

                                                                           The Somme Association's photo.                                                                                            

Sunday 29th June

0800hrs                                   Breakfast in Hotel

0830hrs                                   Depart for full day’s tour into Belgium.

Morning: Visits shall include; the 16th (Irish) Division Memorial, The Island of Ireland Peace Park, Spanbroekmolen Mine Crater, and Lone Tree Cemetery.

Afternoon: Lunch in Ypres, Tyne Cot Cemetery, Memorial and Visitor Centre, and Langemark German Cemetery. 

Return to Ypres for dinner (at leisure) and Last Post Ceremony at the Menin Gate at 2000hrs (please be at the gate for no later the 1945hrs). One wreath will be laid on behalf of the group rather than by individuals.

22:00hrs                      (approx) Arrive back at hotel.             Evening at Leisure

The Somme Association's photo. 

Monday 30th June

0730hrs                                   Breakfast in hotel.

0900hrs                       Morning: Depart hotel for the Somme area, stopping on the way at the Australian Memorial at Villers Bretonneux. Morning visits will include Martinsart and the Canadian Memorial Newfoundland Parc.

1300hrs                       Afternoon: Lunch at the Ulster Memorial Tower followed by the guided tour of Thiepval Wood. Other afternoon activities will include the South African Memorial at Delville Wood and Authuille Cemetery.

1830hrs                                   Arrive back at hotel.                            Evening at leisure

 The Ulster Tower and Mill Road Cemetery today

 The Somme Association's photo. 

Tuesday 1st July

0730hrs                                   Breakfast in hotel.

0900hrs                       Morning: Depart for Thiepval. At 1100hrs Commonwealth Service of Remembrance at Thiepval Memorial to the Missing.  

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Somme Association Pilgrimage I

On this Day, 28th June

On this day 70 years ago, 28th June 1944, I was born in the Westroyd Nursing home in Clifton Street, Bangor, County Down, Northern Ireland , near to the beloved monastery founded by Comgall of the Ancient British Cruthin or Pretani, and a few yards from Bangor Grammar School which I attended with David Trimble . And today 28th June, 2014, I am travelling, as I always do, on our Pilgrimage to the Ulster Tower at Thiepval, as chairman of the Somme Association, which I founded with the help of my friend David Campbell in 1990. We commemorate the heroic deeds of the Sons of Ulster who fought at the immortal Battle of the Somme on 1st July, 1916. I especially remember my two grannies’ cousin William Sloan of Conlig, who died on that day. We were all of ancient Irish stock and descended from Alexander Sloan, the father of Sir Hans Sloane of Killyleagh 

On this day 100 years ago, 28th June 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria , heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian  throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in Sarajevo, by Gavrilo Princip, one of a group of six members of the Black Hand Commando (five Serbs and one Bosnian Moslem), coordinated by Danilo Ilić. The political objective of the assassination was to break off Austria-Hungary’s south-Slav provinces so they could be combined into a Yugoslavia. The assassins’ motives were consistent with the movement which later became known as Young Bosnia. The assassination led directly to the First World War when Austria-Hungary subsequently issued an ultimatum against Serbia, which was partially rejected. Austria-Hungary then declared war, marking the outbreak of the war.

Leading these Serbian military conspirators was Chief of Serbian Military Intelligence Dragutin Dimitrijević, his right hand man Major Vojislav Tankosić, and Masterspy Rade Malobabić. Major Tankosić armed the assassins with bombs and pistols and trained them. The assassins were given access to the same clandestine network of safe-houses and agents that Rade Malobabić used for the infiltration of weapons and operatives into Austria-Hungary.

The assassins, the key members of the clandestine network, and the key Serbian military conspirators who were still alive were arrested, tried, convicted and punished. Those who were arrested in Bosnia were tried in Sarajevo in October 1914. The other conspirators were arrested and tried before a Serbian kangaroo court on the French-controlled Salonika Front in 1916–1917 on unrelated false charges; Serbia executed three of the top military conspirators. Much of what is known about the assassinations comes from these two trials and related records. 

Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria

Gavrilo Princip

Photograph of the Archduke and his wife emerging from the Sarajevo Town Hall to board their car, a few minutes before the assassination

Under the 1878 Treaty of Berlin, Austro-Hungary had received the mandate to occupy and administer the Ottoman Vilayet of Bosnia while the Ottoman Empire retained official sovereignty. Under this same treaty, the Great Powers (Austria-Hungary, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Ottoman Empire, and Russian Empire) gave official recognition to the Principality of Sebia as a fully sovereign state, which four years later transformed into a kingdom under Prince Milan IV Obrenović who thus became King Milan I Obrenović. Serbia’s monarchs at the time from the royal House of Obrenović which maintained close relations with Austria-Hungary were content to reign within the borders set by the treaty.

This changed in May 1903 when Serbian military officers led by Dragutin Dimitrijević, stormed the Sebian Royal Palace. After a fierce battle in the dark the attackers captured General Laza Petrović, head of the Palace Guard, and forced him to reveal the hiding place of King Alexander I Obrenović and his wife Queen Draga. The King and Queen opened the door from their hiding place. The King was shot thirty times; the Queen eighteen. MacKenzie writes that “the royal corpses were then stripped and brutally sabred.” The attackers threw the corpses of King Alexander and Queen Draga out of a palace window, ending any threat that loyalists would mount a counterattack.” General Petrović was then killed too (Vojislav Tankosić organized the murders of Queen Draga’s brothers; Dimitrijević and Tankosić in 1913–1914 and figured prominently in the plot to assassinate Franz Ferdinand). The conspirators installed Peter I of the House of Karaðorðević as the new king.

The new dynasty was more nationalistic, friendlier to Russia and less friendly to Austria-Hungary. Over the next decade, disputes between Serbia and its neighbors erupted as Serbia moved to build its power and gradually reclaim its 14th-century empire. These conflicts included a customs dispute with Austria-Hungary beginning in 1906 (commonly referred to as the “Pig War”), the Bosnian Crisis of 1908–1909 in which Serbia assumed an attitude of protest over Austria-Hungary’s annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina (ending in Serbian acquiescence without compensation in March 1909), and finally the two Balkan Wars of 1912–1913 in which Serbia conquered Macedonia and Kosova from the Ottoman Empire and drove out Bulgaria.

Serbia’s military successes and Serbian outrage over the Austro-Hungarian annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina emboldened nationalistic elements in Serbia and Serbs in Austria-Hungary who chafed under Austro-Hungarian rule and whose nationalist sentiments were stirred by Serbian “cultural” organizations. In the five years leading up to 1914, lone assassins – mostly Serbian citizens of Austria-Hungary – made a series of unsuccessful assassination attempts in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina against Austro-Hungarian officials. The assassins received sporadic support from Serbia.

On 15 June 1910 Bogdan Žerajić attempted to kill the iron-fisted Governor of Bosnia and Herzegovina, general Marijan Varešanin. Žerajić was a 22-year-old Orthodox Serb from Nevesinje, Herzegovina, who made frequent trips to Belgrade. (General Verešanin went on to crush the last Bosnian peasant uprising in the second half of 1910.) The five bullets Žerajić fired at Verešanin and the fatal bullet he put in his own brain made Žerajić an inspiration to future Serbian assassins, including Princip and Princip’s accomplice Čabrinović. Princip said that Žerajić “was my first model. When I was seventeen I passed whole nights at his grave, reflecting on our wretched condition and thinking of him. It is there that I made up my mind sooner or later to perpetrate an outrage.”

In 1913, Emperor Franz Joseph commanded Archduke Franz Ferdinand to observe the military manœuvers in Bosnia scheduled for June 1914. Following the maneuvers Ferdinand and his wife planned to visit Sarajevo to open the state museum in its new premises there. Duchess Sophie, according to their oldest son, Duke Maximilian, accompanied her husband out of fear for his safety.

As a “Czech countess [she] was treated as a commoner at the Austrian court”. Emperor Franz Joseph had only consented to their marriage on the condition that their descendants would never ascend the throne. The 14th anniversary of the morganatic oath  fell on 28 June. As historian A.J.P. Taylor observes:

[Sophie] could never share [Franz Ferdinand’s] rank … could never share his splendours, could never even sit by his side on any public occasion. There was one loophole … his wife could enjoy the recognition of his rank when he was acting in a military capacity. Hence, he decided, in 1914, to inspect the army in Bosnia. There, at its capital Sarajevo, the Archduke and his wife could ride in an open carriage side by side … Thus, for love, did the Archduke go to his death.

Franz Ferdinand was an advocate of increased federalism and widely believed to favor trialism, under which Austria-Hungary would be reorganized by combining the Slavic lands within the Austro-Hungarian empire into a third crown. A Slavic kingdom could have been a bulwark against Serb irredendism and Franz Ferdinand was therefore perceived as a threat by those same irredentists. Princip later stated to the court that preventing Franz Ferdinand’s planned reforms was one of his motivations.

So it was that the archduke  travelled to Sarajevo in June 1914 to inspect the imperial armed forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina, annexed by Austria-Hungary in 1908. The annexation had angered Serbian nationalists, who believed the territories should be part of Serbia. The group of young nationalists hatched a plot to kill the archduke during his visit to Sarajevo, and after some missteps, 19-year-old Gavrilo Princip was able to shoot the royal couple at point-blank range, while they travelled in their official procession, killing both almost instantly. The day of the assassination, 28 June, is 15 June in the Julian Calendar, the feast of St Vitus. In Serbia, it is called Vidovdan and commemorates the 1389 Battle of Kosovo against the Ottomans, at which the Sultan was assassinated in his tent by a Serb; it is an occasion for Serbian patriotic observances.

The assassination set off a rapid chain of events, as Austria-Hungary immediately blamed the Serbian government for the attack. As large and powerful Russia supported Serbia, Austria asked for assurances that Germany would step in on its side against Russia and its allies, including France and possibly Great Britain. On 28 July, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, and the fragile peace between Europe’s great powers collapsed, beginning the devastating conflict now known as the Great War. After more than four years of bloodshed, World War I ended on 11 November 1918, after Germany, the last of the Central Powers, surrendered to the Allies.

On this day 28 June 1919, five years to the day after Franz Ferdinand’s death, Germany and the Allied Powers signed the Treaty of Versailles, officially marking the end of World War I. At the peace conference in Paris in 1919, Allied leaders would state their desire to build a post-war world which was safe from future wars of such enormous scale. The Versailles Treaty tragically failed to achieve this objective. U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s grand dreams of an international peace-keeping organisation faltered when put into practice as the League of Nations. Even worse, the harsh terms imposed on Germany, the war’s biggest loser, led to widespread resentment of the treaty and its authors in that country – a resentment that would culminate in the outbreak of World War II decades later. I was born just as that War was ending.

 
Posted in Article | Comments Off on On this Day, 28th June

The Folly of Richard Haass

Dr Richard Haass

The unwelcome intervention of Richard Haass into the Language debate will bring untold damage to the Gaelic language in Northern Ireland..His blanket use of the term “Irish Language”, which has been used as a political weapon by Republicans, will bring shudders of apprehension to most members of the Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist community. The imposition of a standard “Irish Language” into our system will do nothing for Gaelic as a living entity, yet at the same time drawing away much needed funds from our hospitals, libraries and schools. 

So what does Mr Haass mean by “Irish Language”. The division between Ulster Gaelic and that of the rest of Ireland developed well before the arrival of English from the 17th century. T.F.O’Rahilly (1932) outlined a number of features which distinguished the two major Irish Gaelic languages and regarded the position of word stress as one of the most important of these. He believed that the Southern language reached south Co. Meath in the east. The boundary then ran west through Westmeath and Longford to South Galway. The Southern language was more homogenous than that of Ulster and more widespread, occupying at least three-quarters of the island. 

Ulster Gaelic was characterised by an increasing influence of Scottish Gaelic as one proceeded north and east, though some Scots influence was evident everywhere in Ulster and East Ulster Gaelic is almost indistinguishable from that of Hebridean Islay and Argyll. English was to take over the distribution patterns of the Gaelic language during and after the 17th century, thus perpetrating that ancient frontier between Ulster and the rest of Ireland evidenced also in the structure known as the Black Pig’s Dyke.

At the beginning of the 20th century in that area which now constitutes Northern Ireland there were eight districts in which dialects of Ulster Gaelic survived among 5% or more of the total population. As well as the Red Bay Gaeltacht of the Glens of Antrim and Rathlin Island, constituting East Ulster Gaelic, the Mid-Ulster Gaeltacht centring on the Sperrins lay entirely within what was to become Northern Ireland. The last native speaker of East Ulster Gaelic from Rathlin died in our early Eighties. 

There were also three areas along the border which were extensions of localities in which Gaelic was spoken by a higher percentage of people. These were South Armagh Gaelic, which was part of the old Oriel Gaelic spoken also in Louth and Monaghan; west Tyrone Gaelic, which was an extension of Donegal or West Ulster Gaelic; and south-west Fermanagh Gaelic which was an outlier of the Gaelic of Cavan and Leitrim. Perhaps the most literary and beautiful of these was the Gaelic of Old Oriel. A fourth border area was Strabane, which was formed by immigration from Mid-Ulster and Donegal. The eighth area was around Trillick in southwest Tyrone. 

The Gaelic heritage survives in Ulster in place and personal names, i.e. Shankill and Craig. In fact, there are more of these names of Gaelic derivation in Ulster than anywhere else in Ireland. Ulster Gaelic however has seriously declined as a living language. There are now only two small Gaelic-speaking areas in Donegal of 8,400 and 2,000 souls, with a further 15,500 in the remainder of the island (Desmond Fennell). This was due firstly to the effects of the industrial revolution taking people from the land and concentrating them in the major cities which were English-speaking, secondly to the early antagonism of both Church and State and more recently to feelings that Gaelic-speaking had become the weekend sport of the urban elite, with subsequent rejection by the people. Recently however the language has re-established itself in West Tyrone and Belfast, where it has become a badge of national identity.

 
Yet the decline of Ulster Gaelic also owes much to Irish Nationalism itself. The main problem for the early Gaelic nationalist was that there was no single “caint na ndoine” or language of the people to promote as the “Irish Language”, but an extensive range of local idioms and grammatical forms. Most scholars agreed with T.F.O’Rahilly that “in the case of Irish it is especially necessary that a standard language be left to evolve itself …the pressing problem of the hour is to keep alive and vigorous every one of the last few dialects of Irish that have survived. Little good would a manufactured ‘literary’ language be if once the stream of living Irish … is allowed to dry up” (Studies, 1923). In the early 1940’s with the development of the Gaelic nationalist urban elite, de Valera requested the translation department of the Eire parliament (since there was no central Academy to direct language reform) to produce a standard reformed spelling. 

This they did in 1945, followed by a proposed standard grammar in 1953, which was composed mainly of forms selected from Munster and Connaught Gaelic, and largely ignored the Ulster Gaelic of Donegal, Rathlin and the Glens. This standard grammar has now been generally adopted as the “Irish Grammar”. One of the most influential essays prior to its development was Forbairt na Gaeilge by Niall O Domhnaill, ironically of Donegal Gaeltacht origin. O Domhnaill’s work was vigorously nationalistic, strongly advocating the artificial development of a standard language as the “mental tool for a new national life” and he declared that the standard would be created in Dublin. For O Domhnaill the main goal of Gaelic revivalism was “to give Irish a national character”. This was bound engender hostility towards Gaelic among the Unionist population of Ulster, who could have acted to preserve more of their ancient heritage. This hostility will be enhanced by Mr Haass’s intervention, which will hinder, if not destroy, recent attempts to promote the language in East Belfast.

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Folly of Richard Haass

Scotland’s Choice : Reshaping Relationships?

A One Day Conference

Venue: Queen’s University Belfast, Council Chamber

Date :  25 June 2014 

Organised by the School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen’s University Belfast (QUB), and supported by the Political Studies Association (PSA ) Specialist Groups on Britishness and on Irish Politics. 

The Scottish Referendum of 18 September 2014 represents an important constitutional milestone in the history of the UK state and, more broadly, the Britsh Isles. The outcome will have profound significance for the various relationships spanning Britain and Ireland, perhaps in particular that of Scotland and Northern Ireland. This conference will explore both the historical background to these relationships, and the questions and challenges that either a ‘Yes’ or a ‘No’ vote in the referendum might pose. The event will bring together contributors from the worlds of politics, journalism, the policy community and civil society as well as academia. 

PROGRAMME

9am     Tea/coffee

9.15     Welcome:  Dr. Cathy Gormley-Heenan (PSA) and Professor David Phinnemore (QUB)

9.30     Introductory Lecture: Prof. Graham Walker (QUB),  ‘Tangled Histories’

10.00   Lesley Riddoch (Columnist in The Scotsman and author of ‘Blossom: What Scotland Needs To Flourish’)

‘Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Independence Referendum: Will Life Ever Be the Same?’

Chair: Dr. Andrew Sanders (QUB)

11.00   Tea/coffee

11.15   Murdo Fraser (Member of the Scottish Parliament for Mid-Scotland and Fife)

‘A Federal Future for the UK?’

Chair: Prof. Graham Walker(QUB) 

12.15   Lunch. Food provided.

Conversation and debate will continue with live tweeting and links to the ‘Slugger O’Toole’ website. 

1.15   Andy Mycock (University of Huddersfield),  ‘The imminent death of ethnic Britishness? Culture, identity and the post-British state(s)’

Catherine McGlynn (University of Huddersfield) and Murray Leith (University of the West of Scotland),  ‘Reading from the same script: The DUP and the SNP in comparative analysis’

Chair: Andrew Charles (QUB) 

2.30   Andre Lecours (University of Ottawa),  ‘Nationalism and self-determination referendums: Scotland/UK, Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain’

Chair and Discussant: Elodie Fabre (QUB) 

3.30  Tea/coffee 

3.45   Panel  Discussion: ‘Possible Futures’, featuring contributions from Danny Kinahan (MLA), Paul Gillespie (Irish Times), John Coakley (QUB), and John Dallat (MLA)

Chair: Dr. Margaret O’Callaghan (QUB) 

4.45 Closing Remarks 

ADMISSION IS FREE.  HOWEVER, PLEASE RESERVE YOUR PLACE AT g.s.walker@qub.ac.uk

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Scotland’s Choice : Reshaping Relationships?